Link to Google Doc
I have not been able to write a blogpost in its entirety for a while. Mostly because I seem to be unable to actually structure my thoughts to make them readable in a longer format. Instead I will share a few short notes on what I have been thinking about the last week. I might expand on these topics in the future, because I like them.
What it is like to be a bat?
This paper by Thomas Nagel on the mind-body problem and the impossibilities that consciousness brings into our understanding of the subjective experiences of other species is a great read. I re-read it this week and I realized that this paper actually has formed much of my thinking on interactions with humans. In the paper Nagel floats the idea that the human consciousness and imagination makes it impossible to understand the subjective experiences of others, since all of our thoughts arise from our subjective experiences. This has led me to understand that I will never fully understand how another person experiences the world around them. With this view in mind one can approach other people, and species, in a more understanding and open-minded way. (Link to the paper)
If you have not yet listened to the Joe Rogan podcast with Naval Ravikant, then I urge you to do that. Naval is an interesting thinker, not only in the realm of business, wealth etc. but he also has some profound thoughts on life in itself. One of the ideas he has about happiness is that it arises in the absence of desires. Desires are interesting, they are central in human nature, and maybe even in all conscious beings, as they make us act. For us humans desires bring double value, because they implore us to plan and take actions for the future. But this is also where the curse of desire comes in. When we desire something, our brain cannot stop planning or thinking about it. And that means that as long as we have desires, we will also run our mind constantly into the future without acknowledging the present. Thus, to truly be happy, calm, and to live in the present we have to get rid of our desires. An impossible task you say, I agree, maybe desires must exist in our mind. But we can at least try to reduce them to a minimum, to get as close to happiness as possible.
The FED and Inequality
I have been working on a post about the central bank response to the economic turmoil that the coronavirus brought. It is unfinished, but I thought that I can surface the thoughts here. It seems clear to many that central banks had to act to stabilize the economies of the world when the coronavirus hit, and it became evident that damage was to be done to the real economy. But I fear, that the way in which it has been done can increase inequality and thus the resentment of the lower socio-economic classes. For it is not, primarily, the least well-off that get to reap the benefits of the asset purchasing that the FED has been doing. But as I said, more on this in a longer post, where I, hopefully, can try to explain why and how it has been done and what the potential effects are.
These are some of the things that have been on my mind lately. I would like to finish this post with a beautiful passage from Nietzsche’s The Gay Science (Book Four: St. Januarius, p. 182.)
Taking Seriously. – For most people, the intellect is an awkward, gloomy, creaking machine that is hard to start: when they want to work with this machine and think well, they call it “taking the matter seriously” – oh, how taxing good thinking must be for them! The lovely human beast seems to lose its good mood when it thinks well; it becomes “serious”! And “where laughter and gaiety are found, thinking is good for nothing” – that is the prejudice of this serious beast against all “gay science”. Well then, let us prove it a prejudice!
Have fun while thinking, more importantly, have fun in general!